A heavy equipment supplier and contractor in relation to a highly complex construction arbitration, related local litigation and a number of delay, disruption, defects and other disputes arising out of two fossil fuel construction megaprojects in Africa with claims and counterclaims of over USD 2 billion. The law of the country of the projects applies.
Two international construction contractors, Respondents in an ICC arbitration in London brought by a Middle Eastern State entity arising out of the development of a world-class medical facility in the Middle East. The law of the Claimant’s State governs. Over USD 3 billion at stake.
The Arab Republic of Egypt, Respondent in an investment treaty arbitration under the UNCITRAL Rules, administered by the Permanent Court of Arbitration, in relation to a petrochemical plant. Over USD 2 billion was at stake.
Five gas importers, Respondents in SCC and UNCITRAL arbitrations in Stockholm initiated by an upstream supplier. The disputes arose from a gas price revision clause in long-term supply contracts. Swedish law applied.
A South East Asian listed company, Claimant in an LMAA arbitration in London against a Chinese shipyard. The dispute arose in connection with various shipbuilding contracts. English law applied.
A European natural gas importer in dispute with its upstream supplier regarding financial hardship incurred through performance of the relevant contract’s terms. English law applies.
A European aerospace company in disputes with a US-incorporated service provider concerning issues of delayed or non-performance under the parties’ contract.
A French-German consortium in an ICC arbitration in Stockholm against a Finnish utility company. The dispute arose from an agreement for the construction of a nuclear power plant in Finland. Finnish law governed. Over EUR 6.1 billion was at stake.
A European energy company (as buyer in a long-term gas supply agreement) against another European energy company (as seller) in an ICC arbitration in Geneva. The dispute arose out of a long term, oil-linked gas purchase agreement and concerned the continued marketability of the purchased gas in the relevant downstream, domestic market. New York law applied.
The Democratic Republic of Algeria in an ICSID arbitration initiated by Mærsk Olie, Algeriet A/S (ICSID Case No. ARB/09/14). The arbitration, which was brought under the Algeria-Denmark bilateral investment treaty, was in relation to windfall profit tax in the context of a production-sharing contract. Over USD 3 billion was at stake.
